Name: Joe Rogan Experience #991 - Eddie Bravo
Uploaded: 2017-08-01T01:11:29.000Z
Description: Watch the stand-up comedy video 'Joe Rogan Experience #991 - Eddie Bravo' from PowerfulJRE on Comedy Buff. Published 2017-08-01. Transcript available.

Watch the stand-up comedy video 'Joe Rogan Experience #991 - Eddie Bravo' from PowerfulJRE on Comedy Buff. Published 2017-08-01. Transcript available.

Joe Rogan Experience #991 - Eddie Bravo

Four, three, two, one.
Okay, so I'm on my way over here, and I'm listening to this new Radiolab
podcast,
and they're talking about this new technology that's available,
and I'm like, this is the perfect thing to be listening to right when I'm
coming to hang out with Eddie Bravo.
Oh, no.
There's a website called futureoffakenews.com where they show this new
technology on display.
Well, you know how Adobe does Photoshop, and so they can adjust images?
They can take 20 to 40 minutes.
They can do it with 20.
They prefer to do it with 40.
40 minutes of recorded audio of you talking.
Then they run it through this machine, and they can have you say words you've
never said.
They can have you make sounds that you've never made in those sentences.
So, like, you can have a sentence that says, like, hey, Joe, you want to get
something to eat after the podcast?
And they can intersect.
Hey, Joe, I got a bunch of transgender hookers and some heroin.
You want to get something to eat and go hang out with them after the podcast?
And it would sound exactly like what you said.
It would sound exactly like your own words.
But I'm sure there's going to be experts that can analyze it and go, this is a
fraud.
For now.
What they're essentially saying is this is the infancy of it.
You have to get, like, experts to analyze the audio.
You can see it right there.
They synthesized Barack Obama's audio, and they have him say things that he
never said.
They have him and George Bush going back and forth telling jokes to each other
that they never told.
Dude, can we hear this?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Right now?
Can we?
The thing you're talking about?
Yeah.
I've got to find that.
Okay.
See if you can find that.
It might be on their website.
It doesn't sound good when they're doing that, but it's in its infancy.
But it sounds like them talking.
Yeah.
It just, it sounds a little edited.
Yeah.
You know, it's not flowing together, right?
But apparently they're able to break down faces to the point where, say, they
were saying
that, like, if Jennifer Aniston goes to China and she does a commercial for
something, what
they can do is have Jennifer Aniston talk for a period of time, and they figure
out how her voice
moves, and they take all these images of her face, and they can manipulate it
so accurately,
they can have someone speak in Mandarin Chinese with all the different, you
know, different
sounds they make, and they could sync up her lips and her movement and the
movement of her face
to what it would look like if she was making those actual sounds, which is just
amazing.
So then they can have a voice like a Mandarin-speaking woman who could speak in
Chinese, and you
would see the exact correct movements from Jennifer Aniston's mouth.
So it wouldn't, like, you know how you watch, like, an American movie?
That kind of looks fake, though.
Right.
But, yeah, you said it.
Well, let's hear it.
Let's hear it.
Because our parties have moved further and further apart, and it's harder and
harder to
find common ground.
So, you know, when I said in 2004 that there were no red states or blue states
that are
the United States of America, I was wrong.
See, you could tell by the lips in that one.
Yeah.
If you looked at his lips, it looked funky.
That's not that good.
But that's just now.
Like, what's it going to be like in a year?
What's it going to be like in five years?
And this is what they're saying.
What we're looking at now is the future of fake news.
They're going to be able to recreate people saying things that they never said,
and it's
going to be impossible for you to tell the difference.
So, how can that be used for the Illuminati?
Well, how could they use it?
It could be used for anybody.
That's the problem.
Anybody can use it.
Can you see the good in it?
Is there good in it?
Do you see, oh, now we can do this?
I don't know.
It's hard to say what would be good because you never know what the end result
of anything
is going to be.
When someone creates some sort of a mind-bending, world-changing technology
like that.
It only could be for bad because it's a lie.
It's basically going to be a lie.
Like, whatever comes out of their mouth, it's going to be a lie.
So, there's no way that could be good.
Yeah, but see, what it is is the consequences of technologists pushing
boundaries.
So, the problem is, their intention is not initially to do something bad.
That's one of the interesting things about the Radiolab podcast.
Their intention is probably to make funny things.
Hold on, hold on.
Because the Radiolab podcast talked to the technologists, and they confronted
her with it.
And it's very uncomfortable to watch this lady be confronted with the idea,
like, what if this
is used for evil?
Like, what if it's used for fake news?
And you can tell that they don't, they're not even thinking about that hardly.
All they're trying to do is figure out how to do something that nobody else can
do.
Like, when someone comes up with a technology, if you can come up with some
sort of a voice-manipulating
technology like that, or a visual-manipulating technology, you've got to
realize there's a bunch
of other people that are probably closing in on something like that, too.
And it becomes this mad race to get something done, and to make a shit ton of
money.
If you have something like that, that could be potentially worth, who knows, ungodly
sums of money.
I'm just trying to figure out a way you could use that for good.
To go hard.
Is there a way?
The one thing that they were saying is, you could take recordings of Einstein.
There's hours and hours and hours and hours of recordings of Einstein.
You could create a visual Einstein.
And you could have a 3D technology, perhaps, or a virtual reality technology,
where you're
hanging out, having a fucking conversation with Einstein.
What?
And now, step one, right?
Step two is some sort of a neural interface with virtual reality, where instead
of just
looking at it through goggles, it's going into your mind in some sort of a way.
It's interfacing with the very neurons and your visual cortex.
It's showing you images that you wouldn't really be seeing.
For sure it would be great for brainwashing, though, right?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, for sure.
That's a no-brainer.
That's for sure going to be used for brainwash.
Like fake news, just like you said.
So the thing is, no one gets out alive with this shit.
So this is the thing.
The one thing that might be fascinating about it is, there's going to be no
control.
Like, everyone's going to be able to eventually use something like this.
And they said that it would require, like, painstaking, step-by-step, a person
going over
the data to see if they could figure out what was manipulated.
And they think they could find, like, 75% of the ones that have been
manipulated right now.
Like, they couldn't find the fake ones.
But the problem is, like, the amount of time that it takes to do that is astounding.
It's crazy.
It's people-to-people time.
Like, you have to be sitting there, like, going over it, looking, what is this?
Check that out.
Go back.
What's this number right here?
Why is this off?
What's going on here?
Okay, mark that.
Move on.
And they have to, like, do this over and over and over again.
They'll look for anomalies.
Look for some sort of evidence that it's been manipulated by a digital source
or by some
sort of a digital control, a phone or a computer or something like that.
I think it'll be easy to tell.
In the beginning, maybe.
But, I mean, how good are Photoshop's?
Like, the Photoshop Steve, how good are some of his Photoshop's?
And this dude is just having fun.
Well, how about that Photoshop of, I think it's Neil Armstrong, where he's
standing on
the moon, and it's, like, there's a shot.
There's a shot of him looking down.
It's like a selfie, and then there's the earth in the background.
And they proved that's a Photoshop already.
I mean, they could just run it through shit, just basic shit, and you could see
that it
was cut in.
Well, there was definitely some manipulation of photos for press use.
It's not just speculation.
That was 1969.
That was 1969.
Well, they did it before that, even.
They did it with the Gemini space program.
No one's even defending that picture.
No one's going, that's real.
Nobody defends that picture.
Well, I don't know if they do or don't, but the craziest one is Michael Collins,
because
Michael Collins, you can prove it.
The Gemini 15 picture, they took a test photo of him, like, in, you know, some
sort of a
warehouse, where they would strap him up with a harness, and they're showing
him how to
utilize this equipment.
And then they blacked all that shit out, and reversed the image, and tried to
pretend he
was doing a spacewalk.
You never seen that?
Maybe, maybe.
This is, I mean, I've seen so much on the moon.
This one's the best one.
Isn't it weird?
It's not even the moon.
It's, it's just Michael Collins, but you should see, because it's like, wait a
minute, why
the fuck would they do that?
Like, what are they doing?
They took a photo.
This is 100%.
This is not speculation.
They took a photo of him at a test facility.
Okay.
Where they would, you know, prepare themselves for walking on the moon.
The one on the left is them preparing.
See, you can tell he's in a harness.
There's, there's a bunch of equipment around, and he's hanging on to this thing,
and they're
pulling him, like, with this harness that he's attached to.
And then the next one, it says, it's a spacewalk.
It's the same exact image.
They just blacked it out.
They just took all the stuff that was in the background, all the equipment and
all the bullshit.
That's kind of a blurry copy, see if you can find a better copy of it.
But what they did was they made a fake photo of a guy in space.
That photo's not real.
That's a photo of him in the test suit, and they just reversed it and blacked
out the background.
They could get away with stuff like that back then, man.
It wasn't, that's a better picture of it.
There, you got to get a, that's a good representation.
It's just, what, what they did was, what they did was unquestionably deceptive.
So the question is, how much of that did they do?
Oh, come on.
Well, that's the question.
The question is, it's even this hardcore, the most hardcore skeptics.
Now, even the most hardcore skeptics, they're like, yeah, I'm on the fence
about that moon thing.
You know, no one's really, no one's really saying, yes, we went to the moon.
Now, even like, Mick West will shut up about that.
You know, there's.
Do you think he will?
I don't think you're right at all.
I think he would definitely argue that we went to the moon.
Well, he's getting paid for that, so, like, I mean, he's got to.
I mean, the dude, the dude backs up every official story.
Yeah, but people do that, not necessarily because they're getting paid.
They do it because that's the mindset they're in.
They're in this mindset.
Like, we were talking about with someone else before the podcast started.
Well, he has a website.
He makes money on his website.
That's what I'm talking about.
There's very little money to be made of debunking things.
Well.
It's not the motivation for doing it when you're a multimillionaire from video
games.
I mean, he made a shit ton of money from selling video games.
He was like some sort of a programmer in video games.
And then he has a good time debunking things.
But he has an official story mentality, is what I would call it, where no
matter what.
Like, there's people that are objective and there's people that are debunkers.
And he's a debunker.
And it doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong about a lot of stuff, but it does
mean that he goes
into things with the intention to debunk and the intention to almost always
gravitate towards
an official story.
Not almost.
Yeah.
Every single time.
He believes Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
Yeah, that's a goofy one.
Come on, man.
That one's goofy.
He believes Tower 7 collapsed at free-fall speed because of fires.
There's a 