Name: Joe Rogan Experience #1828 - Michio Kaku
Uploaded: 2022-06-08T00:00:00.000Z
Description: Watch the stand-up comedy video 'Joe Rogan Experience #1828 - Michio Kaku' from PowerfulJRE on Comedy Buff. Published 2022-06-08. Transcript available.

Watch the stand-up comedy video 'Joe Rogan Experience #1828 - Michio Kaku' from PowerfulJRE on Comedy Buff. Published 2022-06-08. Transcript available.

Joe Rogan Experience #1828 - Michio Kaku

Joe Rogan podcast check it out the Joe Rogan experience trained by day Joe Rogan
podcast by
night all day thanks for doing this I really appreciate it my pleasure anytime
very nice to
meet you in person we actually did a radio show together once remotely a long
time ago I was on
the Obi and Anthony show and you called in that's right alive yeah that was a
blast yeah it was very
fun to talk when a person like yourself you're in this documentary a tear in
the sky and for a
person like yourself who is a very well respected scientist to be discussing
the subject of UFOs
to me it signifies that there's been a shift in the way our culture perceives
these things
that's right it used to be the third rail of a scientific establishment that if
you talk about
UFOs you are pretty much relegated to being a nutcase and the giggle factor
kicks in right yeah but things
have changed then you know because of the fact that the military is now
basically releasing hours of
videotapes of things that defy the normal laws of physics and the military has
admitted that quote
they're not ours before there was always that ambiguity that maybe it's a new
stealth bomber
or a new fantastic device being prepared by the military nope the military now
admits that they're
not ours then the question is whose are they then yeah the 2017 New York Times
article in my mind made
that was a big shift because when the New York Times is reporting about it and
saying that this is
major news and this is real and there's video evidence that they can't ignore
when you talk
to high-level people at the government and people like Commander David Fravor
who had that infamous spotting
off of the coast of San Diego when you hear about people like that that are
very reputable it starts
to change the conversation in a lot of people's eyes right see it used to be
that one person would see something in the sky and say look Martha look there's
something up there now things have changed
now we have multiple sightings by multiple modes that is the gold standard the
gold standard for looking for these objects not just one person but several
people that are reputable not just radar but visual sighting infrared sensors
telescopic
Now we have multiple sightings by multiple modes and so the burden of proof has
shifted
it used to be the burden of proof was on the people who believed in UFOs they
saw something prove it now the burden of proof has shifted to the Pentagon
to the military now they have to prove that these aren't extraterrestrial and
so I think there's been a sea change a sea change in the last just several
years
you know 50 years ago there was a congressional hearing and it was coming out
of Project Blue Book and there was a lot of laughter and a lot of jokes about
things green men and out of space 50 years ago that's the way it was now things
have changed
now people are looking at looking at looking at are they a threat militarily
what kinds of sensors do we have what kind of metrics do we have we now have
frame by frame an analysis of these objects these objects
these objects travel between Mach 5 and Mach 20 that's 20 times the speed of
sound these objects can zigzag and we can measure the g-force inside the this
object the g-forces are several hundred times the force of gravity in other
words any of these objects can zigzag and we can measure the g-force inside the
this object the g-forces are several hundred times the force of gravity in
other words any
living person's bones would be crushed by these objects so they're probably
drones of some sort these objects can drop 70,000 feet in a few seconds think
about that it can drop a tremendous distance in just a few seconds and they can
go underwater this is something that we didn't realize before but yes they can
actually go underwater and they also move without creating an exhaust or
breaking the sound barrier so these are things that we can now document
frame by frame frame by frame looking at these video tapes so for yourself what
was the shift and how did you feel about UFOs say like 10-15 years ago well
there is this giggle factor and it's the third rail of course of your
scientific reputation if you believe in these things but the evidence is accumulating
over the last several years now when I was first approached by Carolyn Corey
the producer of this film
a tear in a tear in the sky I was skeptical I said to myself come on I mean
five days five days you're going to look for her flying saucers in the sky what
happens if the aliens are camera shy and they don't show up in five days so it's
pleasantly surprised when they actually found something they actually have
photographic evidence of objects that can gyrate just the way the Pentagon has
said and so we now have a sea change a
a center of gravity has changed with regards to looking at these objects we no
longer simply look at one individual seeing something in the sky
seeing something in the sky no we demand hours of videotape multiple sightings
by multiple modes that's the gold standard now so what do you think is
happening do you think that this is something that maybe another government
from another country has created that far surpasses our abilities or do you
think that this is coming from some more
from somewhere else well the Pentagon has listed I think five different options
one option of course is that their weather balloons or something that's an
artifact of our space program maybe a piece of rocket that is plunging back
into the earth's atmosphere that's one category another category is anomalous
weather events they happen and they have to be looked at very carefully but the
last option the last option is the last option
is other that is not just the Russians or the Chinese because these objects
apparently can gyrate faster than what the Chinese and the Russians can muster
but it opened the door to the possibility of other they didn't specify what
other was but you can fill in the dots yourself now one possibility for other
is hypersonic drones we see that in warfare now the Russians in the
the battle of Ukraine is actually using hypersonic drones to hit targets inside
Ukraine to be hypersonic you have to go faster than mach 5 anything faster than
five times the speed of sound is called hypersonic and so the Russians are now
fielding hypersonic drones in warfare but you see this is something just in the
last few months these sightings they go back decades into the past with objects
executing these gyrations decades ago
and that's why you have to take them seriously so the Commander David Fravor
event that we talked about off the Nimitz that was 2004 do we have an accurate
understanding about military capability in terms of like drones and propulsion
systems from 2004 or are there things that are classified that we are not going
to have access to like is it possible that you know 18 years ago they had the
capability of the
to have a vehicle or a drone move this way that just that information has just
not been released well two years ago the United States military admitted that
it stopped working on these hypersonic drones why they're unstable they zigzag
and that's why the Russians have put a premium on this technology to evade our
Star Wars program the Russians wanted a rocket that can maneuver and therefore
outwit a
a stationary Star Wars system designed to shoot down these drones so that's why
the Russians have put a priority on this and they've now fielding in warfare we
actually see them as a military weapon two years ago the United States military
stopped its program they're too unstable they they were not reliable and it was
not worth the amount of money to put into it because the military was invested
in the Star Wars program not the anti Star Wars program
but because Vladimir Putin announced the hypersonic drones that the United
States military said oops nope we have to get into the game too so now the
United States is also working on hypersonic drones as well as the Chinese so
the Chinese the Russians and Americans are all working on these things but you
can see how primitive they are we're talking about objects that define the
known laws of aerodynamics with a technology beyond what we have today
and so that's why people are scratching their heads whose are these things if
they're not the Chinese the Russians or the United States so one of the main
points of contention is the lack of visible propulsion method right there's no
essentially there's no heat signature there's nothing that we understand to be
present that normally exists when something is going at a tremendous rate of
speed that's right not only that these
these objects create no sonic booms when you exceed the sound barrier you
create a gigantic boom that is then shatters windows and can be heard miles
around these objects can effortlessly break the sound barrier and not create a
sonic boom and they don't create any exhaust we don't see any exhaust trail
from these objects so either they're an optical illusion of some sort or they
have a set of laws of physics beyond the
what we can muster. Now if they are an optical illusion, if an object were to
move in front of
your eyes traveling at a very slow velocity but you don't know how far they are
away, you may think
that object is very far away from you traveling at enormous velocities. So a
weather balloon drifting
in front of your eyes can simulate an object traveling at hypersonic velocities
if you think
that weather balloon is far away from you. So how do you tell the difference?
Well you look at wind
patterns. It turns out that many of these sightings, these objects, defy the
direction of the wind.
If they are weather balloons that you confuse with a flying saucer, then they
would be moving
with the direction of the wind but these objects do not do that. These objects
can go against the
direction of the wind. Not only that but we have multiple sightings. If an
object is very,
very far away, I mean if an object is close to you but you think it's far away,
then it then it's
traveling at an enormous velocity while it's actually just drifting in front of
your eyes. How do you tell
the difference? By having multiple sensors, radar, infrared sensors, visual
sighting. Then you can tell how far
this object is away from you and then you can say that no, it's an optical
illusion. Well, we do that now.
We have multiple sightings of these objects by radar. We know how the velocity,
the distance,
each time it comes out to be real. And so that's why we're scratching our heads.
Who has this capability?
And the answer is we don't know. Is there anything that's theoretical that you're
aware of that could
be applied like some from some other planet or some other galaxy or whatever
that something that maybe
we have theorized that could be responsible for the way these things are able
to move?
Well, you know, when I talk to my friends who are physicists like myself about
these things,
they sort of like laugh, giggle, their eyes roll up to the heavens. And they
say something very simple,
that a rocket using conventional means would take 70,000 years to reach us from
the nearest star.
Therefore, these objects cannot exist. 70,000 years for a Saturn rocket
traveling at 25,000 miles per
hour to go from a nearest star to the planet Earth. That's why most scientists
disregard these sightings,
because they defy the laws of Einstein. But isn't that kind of silly? Isn't
that kind of like saying,
like, you can't, you know how long it would take you to get a horse from Los
Angeles to Sydney,
Australia? Isn't that kind of like saying that? Exactly. And that's why I say
that that assumes
that these aliens or whatever, are maybe 100 years more advanced than us. But
open your mind to the
possibility that they are 1000 years more advanced than us. 1000 years is
nothing compared to the age of
the universe. Right. The universe is about 13, 13 billion plus years old. That's
how the age of the
universe. And so the age o